Skip to main content

Glopos: From Universal Location Positioning to High Accuracy Positioning

A common question people ask about indoor location positioning goes something like this: "Why do you need Wi-Fi, or BLE, or other technologies? Why can't it be done based on cellular signals?"

The common wisdom, of course, is that cellular signals have so broad a range, so big a coverage area, that they don't differentiate different locations sufficiently. Many mobile companies have implemented indoor positioning based on cellular signals, using multilateration algorithms on cellular signal strengths and antenna locations, and have ended up with 60 to 100 meter inaccuracies on average, often worse.

Glopos, based in Helsinki, didn't take "no" for an answer. Instead of relying on cellular signal strength values, Glopos's technology uses a wider variety of cellular signal parameters, models of cell area and shape, and data from other nearby cells, to build self-learning probabilistic models for estimating positions. Their latest tests have achieved 5-6 meter accuracy based on 3G signals alone. In that same test, the average accuracy of the best 80% of the location estimates was 2.4 meters. (See video below.) This accuracy isn't as good as some other companies have achieved, but it's based solely on cellular signals, while most other companies use Wi-Fi or Bluetooth signals.

The aspect of Glopos's approach that Grizzly Analytics likes the best is that it uses cellular signal parameters that are already being received and processed by every cellphone in the world, as the phones check for incoming calls and messages. So there's literally no additional radio signal processing used to achieve always-on, always-available, 24x7 location positioning, and virtually no additional battery or CPU usage. In principle their technology can run on non-smartphones as well. This universality can open up the door to a lot of new applications running in the background.

The aspect of Glopos's approach that Glopos engineers like best, on the other hand, is that the same algorithms can be used to position based on Wi-Fi or other radio data as well as cellular signals. They have tested their technology on Wi-Fi signals in a mall, and achieved 2-3 meter accuracy, without requiring map data for the site or the extensive fingerprinting process that other Wi-Fi based systems require.

But they didn't stop there. A month ago, when Grizzly Analytics released a report on indoor location positioning systems that achieve sub-meter accuracy, the folks at Glopos felt challenged to show that their technology can also achieve sub-meter accuracy. Their video shows their lab test, using Wi-Fi signals from four Wi-Fi access points around a meter-by-meter grid in their lab. In these conditions, their system achieved 9.4cm accuracy!  (See video below)

To be clear, these sub-meter results were in carefully-constructed lab conditions. Their accuracy in real-world conditions is as described above. But even so, this experiment shows the ability of their algorithms to work on a variety of radio signals to deliver a range of results, based on the signals and the application.

Grizzly Analytics believes that universal works-everywhere and always-on location positioning, such as that delivered by Glopos's technology, will completely revolutionize not only indoor location positioning but location applications in general.

Imagine if your mobile, tablet, or wearable device apps could use your location, indoors or outdoors, every minute of the day, with a few-meter accuracy. Your pedestrian navigation would work right away, even in a big city with bad GPS reception, without waiting for GPS connections. Your check-ins or location-sharing could tell your friends which coffee shop you're in, not just that you're in the mall. The Geotagging in your pictures would be accurate even when you take a picture quickly with GPS turned off. You could see nearby friends who were really nearby, not those who were nearby last time their GPS was turned on. Once location is available all the time, indoors and out, location based applications will work a lot better, all the time, and would drain your battery less.

So when will this universal location positioning be available? Glopos is not bringing their technology to market one mall or hospital at a time, rather they're working to leapfrog into the mass market. There are other companies with technology in the pipeline for universal positioning, some based on a technology called SLAM, but none really in the market, and none that have the low battery and CPU usage that Glopos has.

Hopefully the time is coming soon when our phones can know where they are all the time. Every time you wait for your phone to get GPS lock, or see hours-old locations when you start your applications, think forward to a time when location is universal. Stay tuned!


Here are the videos - first Glopos's test in a mall using only 3G signals:




and then their lab test of highly-accurate positioning:




Popular posts from this blog

Intel demos indoor location technology in new Wi-Fi chips at MWC 2015

Intel made several announcements  at MWC 2015, including a new chipset for wireless connectivity (Wi-Fi) in mobile devices. This new chipset, the 8270, include in-chip support for indoor location positioning. Below we explain their technology and show a video of it in action. With this announcement, Intel joins Broadcom, Qualcomm and other chip makers in moving broad indoor location positioning into mobile device hardware. The transition of indoor location positioning into chips is a trend identified in the newest Grizzly Analytics report on Indoor Location Positioning Technologies , released the week before MWC 2015. By moving indoor location positioning from software into hardware, chips such as Intel's enable location positioning to run continuously and universally, without using device CPU, and with less power consumption. Intel's technology delivers 1-3 meter accuracy, using a technique called multilateration, generating a new location estimate every second. While 1-

Robot Camera Foreshadows an Era of Location-Aware Electronics

A French company called Move 'N See produces a line of camera robots. Their devices act as a smart tripod, holding a video camera and automatically moving and zooming the camera as people of interest move around a site. The idea is simple but amazingly innovative. Photo selfies are easy to take, but video selfies are next to impossible. How can I video myself playing football or doing gymnastics, without setting the camera so far back as to be useless? Do spectators want to spend an entire sporting event carefully videoing their friend or relative moving around the field? Enter Move 'N See's "personal robot cameramen." Their devices aim, pan and zoom a video camera as one or more people move around an area. The people of interest wear armbands whose locations are tracked, enabling the camera controller to know where to aim the camera. The camera controller also includes enough smarts to adjust the camera smoothly and to capture multiple people evenly. T

Waze and Google Maps: A Quick Comparison

I've been a big Waze fan for years, relying on it to make my daily commute as quick as possible.  I try to never leave my hometown without checking Waze first to avoid getting stuck in traffic. For those of you who don't know about Waze, they basically crowd-source traffic information, learning where traffic is slow by measuring how fast their users are moving.  This traffic information is then used to route people in ways that will truly be fastest.  (Apple has reportedly licensed Waze data for their upcoming maps app.) Waze is used most heavily abroad, and is only recently building a following in the States.  (It was also just reviewed on the Forbes site .)  So on a recent trip to the States, I decided to compare Waze to the latest USA-based version of Google Maps for Android. In a nutshell, I reached three conclusions.  (1) Google's use of text-to-speech in their turn-by-turn directions is very nice.   (2) Google's got Waze beat in terms of explaining what