Skip to main content

Seeing Quuppa's indoor location technology at MWC 2015

I first met Fabio and Kimmo from Quuppa in 2012, before Quuppa existed, when they had spent years researching indoor location positioning technologies at Nokia Research Center. Less than a year after that they formed Quuppa, independent of Nokia, to bring their technology to market. At the time I called Quuppa "the newest and oldest in indoor location positioning."

Fast forward two and a half years. Their technology has reached market, it can now track both smartphones and BLE devices, and it's accurate to within 20-50cm. Before reading more about their technology, take a look at a video of their demo in action:



Grizzly Analytics has analyzed indoor location technologies by over 150 companies, and virtually all of the radio-based technologies operate by measuring the distance between the device being tracked and other radio devices, and using these distance measurements for either multilateration or fingerprinting. For example, the well known BLE beacons measure a device's proximity to a BLE beacon by measuring the signal strength of the signals between the beacons and the device being tracked, and using that signal strength to estimate distance. This is also how most Wi-Fi based systems work, using signal strengths as estimates for distance measurement. Some systems use more sophisticated approaches to measure distance more accurately than can be done using signal strength (such as most UWB-based systems and such as some chip-based approaches), but they're still measuring distances.

But Quuppa's system doesn't measure distance, it measures angles. Their unique locator beacons are able to measure the exact angles at which the signal from the BLE device reached the locator, and use those angles to locate the device accurately. One locator by itself can do a reasonable job of positioning, and two or more can achieve the accuracy they promise.

Until recently, Quuppa's technology could only track custom BLE tags and devices, because their technology requires slight changes to the BLE signals transmitted. But recently, the latest iPhone and Android devices enabled applications to access the Host Control Interface of their BLE chips. As long as an iPhone or smartphone running Android 5.0 or higher is running the Quuppa app, that app can transmit BLE signals in a way that can be tracked by the Quuppa locators.

As the video shows, their system can also track a wide variety of other BLE devices. These BLE devices also need a small software change to transmit signals in a manner that Quuppa locators can track. But any BLE devices that supports software changes of this sort can be Quuppa-enabled.

There's a lot more to say about Quuppa's technology, and more details reported in Grizzly Analytics reports. Bottom line, Quuppa's technology delivers accuracy around 20cm, with real-time response, and can track the latest smartphones and a wide variety of BLE devices.

The catch, of course, is that Quuppa's locators aren't as cheap as simple BLE beacons or existing Wi-Fi access points, so using their system isn't for the faint of heart. Quuppa says that the total cost of ownership over time will be comparable to other systems, but I think their system needs to be thought of as a high-end system for people who want great accuracy and response time, and are willing to pay for it.

Bottom line, Quuppa's innovative technology looks great.


Popular posts from this blog

Intel demos indoor location technology in new Wi-Fi chips at MWC 2015

Intel made several announcements  at MWC 2015, including a new chipset for wireless connectivity (Wi-Fi) in mobile devices. This new chipset, the 8270, include in-chip support for indoor location positioning. Below we explain their technology and show a video of it in action. With this announcement, Intel joins Broadcom, Qualcomm and other chip makers in moving broad indoor location positioning into mobile device hardware. The transition of indoor location positioning into chips is a trend identified in the newest Grizzly Analytics report on Indoor Location Positioning Technologies , released the week before MWC 2015. By moving indoor location positioning from software into hardware, chips such as Intel's enable location positioning to run continuously and universally, without using device CPU, and with less power consumption. Intel's technology delivers 1-3 meter accuracy, using a technique called multilateration, generating a new location estimate every second. While 1-

The year indoor location will truly take off

For years I've been writing sentences like "this will be the year that indoor location will explode into the market." I, and many others, have been expecting indoor location technology to enable the huge range of location-enabled apps, which currently work only outside where GPS signals are available, to work inside. But until now the promise of indoor location has remained a promise. But if we look at the reasons for this, we'll see that it is about to change. 2017 and 2018 are poised to be the years that the challenges keeping indoor location from going mainstream will be solved. First is accuracy. Most indoor location technologies until a year or so ago had accuracy in the range of 4 to 8 meters. This sounds good in principle, and in fact is better than GPS in many cases. But GPS systems are able to use road details to hide their inaccuracies, so that the blue dot seems to follow your driving car almost perfectly. But indoors, this sort of inaccuracy means y

Waze and Google Maps: A Quick Comparison

I've been a big Waze fan for years, relying on it to make my daily commute as quick as possible.  I try to never leave my hometown without checking Waze first to avoid getting stuck in traffic. For those of you who don't know about Waze, they basically crowd-source traffic information, learning where traffic is slow by measuring how fast their users are moving.  This traffic information is then used to route people in ways that will truly be fastest.  (Apple has reportedly licensed Waze data for their upcoming maps app.) Waze is used most heavily abroad, and is only recently building a following in the States.  (It was also just reviewed on the Forbes site .)  So on a recent trip to the States, I decided to compare Waze to the latest USA-based version of Google Maps for Android. In a nutshell, I reached three conclusions.  (1) Google's use of text-to-speech in their turn-by-turn directions is very nice.   (2) Google's got Waze beat in terms of explaining what